summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465')
-rw-r--r--security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465126
1 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 b/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3873133819b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/openssl31/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+From 07d8baf3367cbbf81877510e5102e6193da4bfe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
+Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:31:25 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Updated CHANGES.md and NEWS.md for CVE-2023-0465
+
+Also updated the entries for CVE-2023-0464
+
+Related-to: CVE-2023-0465
+
+Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
+Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
+(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20586)
+---
+ CHANGES.md | 12 ++++++++++++
+ NEWS.md | 6 +++++-
+ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md
+index 99cabb3057fb..511886d213f9 100644
+--- CHANGES.md.orig
++++ CHANGES.md
+@@ -24,12 +24,22 @@ OpenSSL 3.1
+
+ ### Changes between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 [xx XXX xxxx]
+
++ * Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are
++ silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped
++ for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert
++ invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the
++ certificate altogether.
++ ([CVE-2023-0465])
++
++ *Matt Caswell*
++
+ * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate
+ against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which
+ should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit
+ can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build
+ time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow
+ unlimited growth.
++ ([CVE-2023-0464])
+
+ *Paul Dale*
+
+@@ -19689,6 +19699,8 @@ ndif
+
+ <!-- Links -->
+
++[CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465
++[CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464
+ [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401
+ [CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286
+ [CVE-2023-0217]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0217
+diff --git a/NEWS.md b/NEWS.md
+index c243c5e6818a..23f918f604ea 100644
+--- NEWS.md.orig
++++ NEWS.md
+@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ OpenSSL 3.1
+
+ ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.1.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.1 [under development]
+
+- * none
++ * Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates
++ ([CVE-2023-0465])
++ * Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464])
+
+ ### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.0 and OpenSSL 3.1.0 [14 Mar 2023]
+
+@@ -1446,6 +1448,8 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.x
+ * Support for various new platforms
+
+ <!-- Links -->
++[CVE-2023-0465]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0465
++[CVE-2023-0464]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0464
+ [CVE-2023-0401]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0401
+ [CVE-2023-0286]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0286
+ [CVE-2023-0217]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-0217
+From facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
+Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
+ certs
+
+Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
+later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
+cert was bad.
+
+Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
+
+Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
+Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
+(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20586)
+---
+ crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 12 ++++++++++--
+ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
+index 9384f1da9bad..a0282c3ef121 100644
+--- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.orig
++++ crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
+@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
+ goto memerr;
+ /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
+ if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
+- int i;
++ int i, cbcalled = 0;
+
+ /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
+- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
++ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
+ X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
+
++ if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0)
++ cbcalled = 1;
+ CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0,
+ ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION);
+ }
++ if (!cbcalled) {
++ /* Should not be able to get here */
++ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
++ return 0;
++ }
++ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
+ return 1;
+ }
+ if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {