diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | security/vuxml/vuln.xml | 51 |
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml index 4c8bb9cb6c77..b36ecf87b6eb 100644 --- a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml +++ b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml @@ -58,6 +58,57 @@ Notes: * Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.) --> <vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1"> + <vuln vid="afc60484-0652-440e-b01a-5ef814747f06"> + <topic>ruby -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic> + <affects> + <package> + <name>ruby</name> + <range><ge>2.3.0,1</ge><lt>2.3.8,1</lt></range> + <range><ge>2.4.0,1</ge><lt>2.4.5,1</lt></range> + <range><ge>2.5.0,1</ge><lt>2.5.2,1</lt></range> + </package> + </affects> + <description> + <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Ruby news:</p> + <blockquote cite="https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released/"> + <p>CVE-2018-16395: OpenSSL::X509::Name equality check does not work + correctly</p> + <p>An instance of OpenSSL::X509::Name contains entities such as CN, C and + so on. Some two instances of OpenSSL::X509::Name are equal only when + all entities are exactly equal. However, there is a bug that the + equality check is not correct if the value of an entity of the + argument (right-hand side) starts with the value of the receiver + (left-hand side). So, if a malicious X.509 certificate is passed to + compare with an existing certificate, there is a possibility to be + judged incorrectly that they are equal.</p> + <p>CVE-2018-16396: Tainted flags are not propagated in Array#pack and + String#unpack with some directives</p> + <p>Array#pack method converts the receiver's contents into a string with + specified format. If the receiver contains some tainted objects, the + returned string also should be tainted. String#unpack method which + converts the receiver into an array also should propagate its tainted + flag to the objects contained in the returned array. But, with B, b, H + and h directives, the tainted flags are not propagated. So, if a script + processes unreliable inputs by Array#pack and/or String#unpack with + these directives and checks the reliability with tainted flags, the + check might be wrong.</p> + </blockquote> + </body> + </description> + <references> + <url>https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/ruby-2-5-2-released/</url> + <url>https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/openssl-x509-name-equality-check-does-not-work-correctly-cve-2018-16395/</url> + <url>https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/10/17/not-propagated-taint-flag-in-some-formats-of-pack-cve-2018-16396/</url> + <cvename>CVE-2018-16395</cvename> + <cvename>CVE-2018-16396</cvename> + </references> + <dates> + <discovery>2018-10-17</discovery> + <entry>2018-10-20</entry> + </dates> + </vuln> + <vuln vid="ec5072b0-d43a-11e8-a6d2-b499baebfeaf"> <topic>MySQL -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic> <affects> |