summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOliver Eikemeier <eik@FreeBSD.org>2004-06-21 22:03:48 +0000
committerOliver Eikemeier <eik@FreeBSD.org>2004-06-21 22:03:48 +0000
commitb25dd491d8e3e2b59dfd2f2e7d3d288cfd9140ef (patch)
tree2b91b94f6c629e772c65a190995a69245d27d184 /security
parentChase rerolled tarball, unbreak (diff)
I believe that linux-png-1.2.2 still contains the vulnerability.
Add some references that support this opinion.
Notes
Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=111962
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r--security/vuxml/vuln.xml5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
index d326be767744..544bc57f00aa 100644
--- a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
+++ b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
<affects>
<package>
<name>linux-png</name>
- <range><lt>1.2.2</lt></range>
+ <range><le>1.2.2</le></range>
</package>
<package>
<name>png</name>
@@ -1059,6 +1059,9 @@ EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
<references>
<cvename>CAN-2004-0421</cvename>
<url>http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120508</url>
+ <url>http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-181.html</url>
+ <url>http://www.osvdb.org/5726</url>
+ <bid>10244</bid>
</references>
<dates>
<discovery>2004-04-29</discovery>