- Backport patches to fix KCalc issues.

Submitted by:	Raphael Kubo da Costa <kubito@gmail.com> via area51

1 files changed, 35 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/security/kgpg-kde4/files/patch-ark-kerfuffle-cliiterface.cpp b/security/kgpg-kde4/files/patch-ark-kerfuffle-cliiterface.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f2298e0f4493
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/kgpg-kde4/files/patch-ark-kerfuffle-cliiterface.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+SVN commit 1240907 by rkcosta:
+
+cliinterface: Do not assume a process does not exist in runProcess().
+
+The Q_ASSERT(!m_process) in the beginning of runProcess() was wrong, as when
+one is adding files to an archive (or creating an archive) processFinished()
+calls list(), which in turn calls runProcess() as well, thus making the assert
+fail.
+
+The best thing to do is just wait for the existing process to finish before
+launching the new one.
+
+Backport of r1240907, in case the 4.6 ever gets packaged again.
+
+CCBUG: 277393
+
+http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1240908
+-- ark/kerfuffle/cliinterface.cpp	2011/06/01 20:35:06	1234597
++++ ark/kerfuffle/cliinterface.cpp	2011/07/11 03:23:39	1240908
+@@ -325,10 +325,13 @@
+         return false;
+     }
+ 
+-    Q_ASSERT(!m_process);
+-
+     kDebug() << "Executing" << programPath << arguments;
+ 
++    if (m_process) {
++        m_process->waitForFinished();
++        delete m_process;
++    }
++
+ #ifdef Q_OS_WIN
+     m_process = new KProcess();
+ #else