summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/www/firefox10/pkg-message
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlan Eldridge <alane@FreeBSD.org>2002-11-05 12:00:22 +0000
committerAlan Eldridge <alane@FreeBSD.org>2002-11-05 12:00:22 +0000
commitb57da78d89a24c4efe833e7f9efea2089ff4f047 (patch)
tree451991c72037c80443714aa04253402d9876e34f /www/firefox10/pkg-message
parentUpgrade to 2.43, which has some nice bug fixes, most significantly (diff)
Upped to PORTREVISION 4.
Added pkg-message file. Put XP_UNIX in MAKE_ENV just to be safe. Show pkg-message at start and end. I think it's stabilized now.
Notes
Notes: svn path=/head/; revision=69519
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--www/firefox10/pkg-message37
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/www/firefox10/pkg-message b/www/firefox10/pkg-message
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..79ed378ae068
--- /dev/null
+++ b/www/firefox10/pkg-message
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+======================================================================
+As of version 0.4_4, this port appears to be stable. It will work with
+either of the port versions of perl, provided you do "use.perl port".
+It may work with the base system version of perl; I (AlanE) have not
+tested this.
+
+NOTE: if you use the lang/perl5.8 port, please remove the File::Spec
+package with the command "pkg_deinstall -f p5-File-Spec". If you are
+updating to the 5.8 version of perl, please do this *first*.
+
+Any bug reports should be addressed to the maintainers at:
+ phoenix@geeksrus.net
+You may also Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org. Please do not send
+bug reports to any other addresses.
+
+Please include the following information with any bug report:
+
+1. Date/time stamp from www/phoenix/Makefile.
+2. Perl version used (/usr/bin/perl --version).
+3. If a port, did you do "use.perl port"? If no, why didn't you
+ follow the instructions provided?
+4. If perl 5.8, did you remove the p5-File-Spec port? If no, why
+ didn't you follow the instructions provided?
+5. Where/when did the problem occur: configuring, building, or
+ running phoenix?
+6. Can you reproduce the problem? If so, how? If not, why do you
+ think we can fix it?
+7. If you just have a philosophical difference of opinion with how
+ this port is set up, without any factual basis, why are you
+ bothering us with it? I (AlanE) have other PRs to attend to, and
+ Trevor has work to do as well.
+
+Thank you for your help in testing and report bugs, and we hope you
+enjoy using Phoenix.
+The Maintainers (alane@ & trevor@)
+======================================================================
+