diff options
| author | Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> | 2015-07-06 17:31:21 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> | 2015-07-06 17:31:21 +0000 |
| commit | 7517e4aa5cb2c049fa44c1b32c7546c57728b6ba (patch) | |
| tree | b4de35583ac377754528669f3fc2cfd357afeb51 /security | |
| parent | mail/rainloop: Upgrade 1.8.2 -> 1.9.2 (diff) | |
Document recent squid vulnerabilities
PR: 201374
Notes
Notes:
svn path=/head/; revision=391429
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
| -rw-r--r-- | security/vuxml/vuln.xml | 83 |
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml index 777f2a4bfc91..2513fa1e007c 100644 --- a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml +++ b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml @@ -57,6 +57,89 @@ Notes: --> <vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1"> + <vuln vid="150d1538-23fa-11e5-a4a5-002590263bf5"> + <topic>squid -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic> + <affects> + <package> + <name>squid</name> + <range><ge>3.5</ge><lt>3.5.6</lt></range> + </package> + </affects> + <description> + <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Amos Jeffries, Squid-3 release manager, reports:</p> + <blockquote cite="http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/06/8"> + <p>Due to incorrect handling of peer responses in a hierarchy of 2 or + more proxies remote clients (or scripts run on a client) are able to + gain unrestricted access through a gateway proxy to its backend + proxy.</p> + <p>If the two proxies have differing levels of security this could + lead to authentication bypass or unprivileged access to supposedly + secure resources.</p> + <p>Squid up to and including 3.5.5 are apparently vulnerable to DoS + attack from malicious clients using repeated TLS renegotiation + messages. This has not been verified as it also seems to require + outdated (0.9.8l and older) OpenSSL libraries.</p> + </blockquote> + </body> + </description> + <references> + <mlist>http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/06/8</mlist> + </references> + <dates> + <discovery>2015-07-06</discovery> + <entry>2015-07-06</entry> + </dates> + </vuln> + + <vuln vid="b6da24da-23f7-11e5-a4a5-002590263bf5"> + <topic>squid -- client-first SSL-bump does not correctly validate X509 server certificate</topic> + <affects> + <package> + <name>squid</name> + <range><ge>3.5</ge><lt>3.5.4</lt></range> + <range><ge>3.4</ge><lt>3.4.13</lt></range> + </package> + <package> + <name>squid33</name> + <range><ge>3.3</ge><lt>3.3.14</lt></range> + </package> + <package> + <name>squid32</name> + <range><ge>3.2</ge><lt>3.2.14</lt></range> + </package> + </affects> + <description> + <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Squid security advisory 2015:1 reports:</p> + <blockquote cite="http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2015_1.txt"> + <p>Squid configured with client-first SSL-bump does not correctly + validate X509 server certificate domain / hostname fields.</p> + <p>The bug is important because it allows remote servers to bypass + client certificate validation. Some attackers may also be able + to use valid certificates for one domain signed by a global + Certificate Authority to abuse an unrelated domain.</p> + <p>However, the bug is exploitable only if you have configured + Squid to perform SSL Bumping with the "client-first" or "bump" + mode of operation.</p> + <p>Sites that do not use SSL-Bump are not vulnerable.</p> + <p>All Squid built without SSL support are not vulnerable to the + problem.</p> + </blockquote> + <p>The FreeBSD port does not use SSL by default and is not vulnerable + in the default configuration.</p> + </body> + </description> + <references> + <cvename>CVE-2015-3455</cvename> + <url>http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2015_1.txt</url> + </references> + <dates> + <discovery>2015-05-01</discovery> + <entry>2015-07-06</entry> + </dates> + </vuln> + <vuln vid="72fccfdf-2061-11e5-a4a5-002590263bf5"> <topic>ansible -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic> <affects> |