summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/INDEX (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* New INDEX for 4.x, with 9037 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-08-161-3049/+3066
|
* New INDEX for 4.x, with 9020 ports!Kris Kennaway2003-07-271-5587/+5741
|
* New INDEX for 4.x, with 8866 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-06-221-5652/+5885
|
* New INDEX for 4.x, with 8633 portsKris Kennaway2003-05-171-4476/+4579
|
* New INDEX for 4.x, with 8530 portsKris Kennaway2003-04-191-4411/+4609
|
* Regenerate INDEX again to deal with the last-minute change to pango.Kris Kennaway2003-03-291-157/+157
|
* Regenerate INDEX for 4.8-R to catch up with port retaggings.Kris Kennaway2003-03-251-6/+6
|
* Porter ManKris Kennaway2003-03-221-4478/+4603
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ---------- (sung to the tune of "Rocket Man" by Elton John) I built my ports last night, pre-freeze Zero hour, nine p.m. And I'm gonna be high As a kite by then I miss the tree so much I miss my ports It's lonely during the freeze Oh such a timeless wait And I think it's gonna be a long, long time 'Til bento brings me 'round again to find This is not the code I think I ran at home Ah, no no no... I'm a Porter man Porter man Waiting out the freeze Down here alone PRs aren't the kind of place To test your ports In fact, it's slow as hell And no one cares to test them If you did And all this code I don't understand It's just my job Seven days a week A porter Man Porter Man And I think it's gonna be a long, long time 'Til bento brings me 'round again to find This is not the code I think I ran at home Ah, no no no... And I think it's gonna be a long, long time 'Til bento brings me 'round again to find This is not the code I think I ran at home Ah, no no no... I'm a porter man Porter man Waiting out the freeze Down here alone And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time And I think it's gonna be a long, long, time Long, long, time Long, long, time Ah, no, no, no... Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no... (This is the candidate INDEX for 4.8-RELEASE, with 8332 ports)
* New INDEX for 4.x, with 8207 ports.Kris Kennaway2003-02-081-5077/+5401
|
* New INDEX for RELENG_4, with 7883 portsKris Kennaway2002-12-301-4671/+4772
|
* New INDEX, with 7782 portsKris Kennaway2002-11-041-4840/+4973
|
* Regenerate INDEX after update to gtar and apache ports. This is now theKris Kennaway2002-10-051-208/+208
| | | | INDEX for 4.7-RELEASE.
* o/~Kris Kennaway2002-10-021-4758/+4884
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | THE LONG AND WINDING CODE The long and winding code that leads to your port. Will never disappear; I've seen that code before. It always leads me here, leads me to your port. Many times I've been alone, and many times I've cried. Anyway you'll never know the many ways I've compiled, but Still they lead me back to the long and winding code. You left me standing here a long, long time ago. Don't leave me waiting here, lead me to your port. o/~ This is the official INDEX for 4.7-RELEASE, containinG 7649 ports. 7649 is a prime number!! Apologies to: The Beatles
* New INDEX with 7523 ports. 7523 is a prime number!Kris Kennaway2002-08-311-3936/+4094
|
* New INDEX, with 7365 ports.Kris Kennaway2002-07-201-4732/+5096
|
* Catch up to last-second PORTREVISION bump in XFree86-Server port forKris Kennaway2002-06-151-5/+5
| | | | inclusion in 4.6-RELEASE.
* This is the INDEX for 4.6-RELEASE.Kris Kennaway2002-05-251-4037/+4103
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The special treat for this release is not a commit song, but the fact that we now have: d88888P a8888a a8888a d88 dP d8' d8' ..8b d8' ..8b 88 88 d8' 88 .P 88 88 .P 88 88 88d888b. .d8888b. 88d888b. d8888P .d8888b. d8' 88 d' 88 88 d' 88 88 88' `88 88' `88 88' `88 88 Y8ooooo. d8' Y8'' .8P Y8'' .8P 88 88. .88 88. .88 88 88 88 d8' Y8888P Y8888P d88P 88Y888P' `88888P' dP dP `88888P' 88 dP in the ports collection! Yes, we now ship over 7000 ported applications! Better yet, 7001 is a prime number!
* New index with 6935 ports. The big diffs are mostly due to a libtoolKris Kennaway2002-05-161-3405/+3495
| | | | | version bump and the addition of a dependency of gettext on expat, which adds dependencies to about 2100 ports.
* New INDEX with 6845 ports. This marks the official changeover to usingKris Kennaway2002-04-271-3991/+4059
| | | | XFree86-4.x in FreeBSD 4.x.
* This is the latest INDEX file for the ports collection under 4.x, withKris Kennaway2002-04-061-3032/+3043
| | | | | | | | 6777 ports. I have to commit this straight away because the 5.0-dp1 INDEX committed just previously is built with a different version of XFree86, and we are not yet ready to switch the 4.x package collection over. This is a bit of a nasty hack (blame Murray :) but one way or another we won't need to keep doing it in the long term.
* This is the INDEX for the 5.0-DP1 snapshot. There are 6766 ports, of whichKris Kennaway2002-04-061-3716/+3807
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | about 5716 packages build under 5.0-DP1 on i386, and 4391 on alpha. o/~ BRAIN DAMAGE The lunatic is in UFS The lunatic is in UFS Remembering /usr/games and vnode chains and graphs Got to keep the loonies in the $PATH The lunatic is in the kernel The lunatics are in the kernel The network drops the routed packets on the floor And every day the cvsup brings more. And if -RELEASE comes many years too soon And if there is no room upon the disk And if your log explodes with dark forbodings too I'll see you on the dark side of 5.0 The lunatic is in my code The lunatic is in my code You fetch the patch, you make the change You re-arrange me 'till I'm sane You lock the var And throw away the key There's someone in my system but it's not me. And if the coredumps thunder in your ear You shout and no one seems to hear And if the sound card starts playing different tunes I'll see you on the dark side of 5.0 o/~
* Repair INDEX: the previous revision accidentally switched from XFree86 3.xKris Kennaway2002-03-111-2665/+2668
| | | | | | to 4.x prematurely, and also contained a lot of 'pollution' from packages installed on the build host (mostly gtk), which were being detected by HAVE_* options in ports which caused them to change names.
* New INDEX file with 6672 ports.Kris Kennaway2002-03-101-3644/+3846
|
* This is the INDEX that'll be used for RELEASE_4_5_0. My aplogies forSteve Price2002-01-291-2839/+2933
| | | | this being a lame commit message without the requisite prose.
* It's been a long timeWill Andrews2002-01-061-2809/+3108
| | | | | | | | The clock has chimed many a full moon since There was an INDEX whereby someone sang But now I've stepped up to the crime And proclaimed "Let this INDEX shine light o'er the land!" And a loud roar from the crowd rang...
* New index of half-month, with 6,077 ports.Satoshi Asami2001-11-191-3548/+3776
|
* This is the official index file for 4.4R. The changes are due toSatoshi Asami2001-09-161-533/+533
| | | | | | | | | | | | | bzip2 coming into the base system (and disappearing from ports dependencies). There are still the same number of ports. In addition: (1) There are 5,305 packages built for the release totaling 4.7GB (2) There are 6,135 distfiles totaling 5.3GB Thanks for everyone's help!
* Well, it's a week now and we have a new date for 4.4 release. So thisSatoshi Asami2001-09-131-1240/+1276
| | | | | | one obviously replaces the original "official" index file for 4.4R. We have 5,849 ports, which is a prime number. (One prime to another..)
* This is the official INDEX file for 4.4R. It has 5,813 ports.Satoshi Asami2001-09-031-3507/+4275
| | | | 5,813 is a prime. :)
* New index, rebuilt due to samba changes. (Gee, how many thingsSatoshi Asami2001-04-181-134/+143
| | | | | | change in just one day....) There are 5,045 ports now.
* New index, with 5,036 ports. Barring any unforseen events, thisSatoshi Asami2001-04-181-3007/+3916
| | | | will be the official index for 4.3R.
* This is an unofficial INDEX file for the rebuilt 4.2R portsSatoshi Asami2000-11-161-550/+576
| | | | collection. There are 4,127 ports.
* Preliminary index for 4.2-release. There are 4,101 (= 3 x 1367)Satoshi Asami2000-11-031-3922/+4101
| | | | | | | ports. Amazing. By the way, I believe the 4,100th port award goes to sada-san's commit of japanese/leafrogue.
* A small commit to fix a screwup of mine yesterday (forgot to changeSatoshi Asami2000-09-231-1236/+1553
| | | | | | | | | | | the categories of ports repo-copied into french and german). However, I have something else to say: the package build just ended, and we have 3,422 (= 2 x 29 x 59) packages for 2,478 (= 2 x 3 x 7 x 59) MB and 3,054 (= 2 x 3 x 509) MB of distfiles for 4.1.1R! Hmm, that's a lot of 2's and 5[0]9's. Maybe imp will tell you what those mean.
* Last minute dependency fix to bugbuddy (which is needed for gnome) andSatoshi Asami2000-07-211-2/+2
| | | | vim5. The release tag will be slid forward to include this revision.
* This is the official index file for 4.1-release. There are 3,605 portsSatoshi Asami2000-07-191-1347/+1549
| | | | | | in here. (Too bad the release number isn't 3.6....) You can check out the ports tree for 4.1R with the tag "RELEASE_4_1_0".
* A new index, with 3,403 ports, which is a nice number, being 41 timesSatoshi Asami2000-06-161-1787/+2033
| | | | | 83. However, more significantly, this is the official index file for 3.5-release (tag: RELEASE_3_5_0). Seems we are about 97 ports short.
* This is the official INDEX file for 4.0-release. There are 3,157 (= 7 xSatoshi Asami2000-03-141-1928/+2238
| | | | | | | | | 11 x 41) ports, requiring 2,222 (= 2 x 11 x 101) MB of distfiles, 2754 (= 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 17) of which can be built as packages, totaling 1,721 (prime!) MB. Since I found a prime, I'm going to stop now. Oh, and you can check out this tree with "cvs co -rRELEASE_4_0_0 ports".
* This is (probably) the official index file for 3.4-release. The tagSatoshi Asami1999-12-111-1049/+1173
| | | | | | is "RELEASE_3_4_0". There are 2,847 ports in this index. 2,847 is 3 x 13 x 73. (Gee, it would have been nice if the release was also 3.3....)
* New index, with 2,723 (= 7 x 389) ports ! This is my first commitSatoshi Asami1999-10-241-606/+683
| | | | back from FreeBSDCon. (Figures, huh? :)
* (forced commit) This is the official index file for 3.3-release.Satoshi Asami1999-09-141-2134/+2421
| | | | The tag is "RELEASE_3_3_0". There are 2,646 ports in this release.
* Despite what I said before, this is the official INDEX file forSatoshi Asami1999-05-141-2/+1
| | | | 3.2R, with 7 x 337 (= 2,359) ports. The tag is "RELEASE_3_2_0".
* New index, with 2 x 2 x 2 x 5 x 59 (that's 2,360 for ourSatoshi Asami1999-05-131-2089/+2360
| | | | | | | | | calculator-challenged friends out there) ports. Unless I screwed up something, this should be the official INDEX for 3.2R. You should be able to get the 3.2R ports tree with cvs co -rRELEASE_3_2_0 ports
* Yipes, committed the wrong one. This is the INDEX file for 3.1R.Satoshi Asami1999-02-141-63/+63
| | | | Sorry.
* This is the official INDEX file for 3.1-release. There are 2,089 ports.Satoshi Asami1999-02-141-96/+101
| | | | You can get the ports tree for 3.1R by using the "RELEASE_3_1_0" tag.
* Second-from-last INDEX before 3.1 release.Satoshi Asami1999-02-121-1220/+1427
|
* This is the official INDEX for 2.2.8-RELEASE. There are 1,877 ports.release/2.2.8Satoshi Asami1998-11-301-1003/+1131
| | | | You can get the 2.2.8R ports tree by doing a "cvs co -rRELEASE_2_2_8 ports".
* This is the official INDEX for 3.0-RELEASE. There are 1,749 ports.release/3.0.0Justin M. Seger1998-10-161-1002/+1131
| | | | You can get the 3.0R ports tree by doing a "cvs co -rRELEASE_3_0_0 ports"
* Fixed INDEX for 2.2.7R. Duplicate entries for Mesa and gimp removed,Satoshi Asami1998-07-221-4/+3
| | | | | and pine package names updated. Jordan said he'll slide the tag forward on this file.
* This is the official INDEX for 2.2.7-RELEASE. There are 1,621 ports,Satoshi Asami1998-07-211-411/+708
| | | | | | | of which (I think) about 600 were committed by Steve. BTW, you can check the ports tree as of 2.2.7R by using the tag "RELEASE_2_2_7".